Abogado mordedor de perros de Texas - Consultas gratis

Abogados de Houston Dog Attack

De acuerdo con el Centro para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades de los Estados Unidos, los perros muerden a más de 4.7 millones de víctimas cada año en los Estados Unidos y aproximadamente 800,000 tiene que buscar atención médica. De ellos, aproximadamente la mitad de ellos son niños. 386,000 requiere tratamiento en una sala de emergencias. Cuando esto te sucede a ti, abogado de mordedura de perro poder ayudar.

At Simmons and Fletcher, P.C., we have seen the serious physical and emotional scars suffered by our clients as a result of a dog owner’s negligence. We have helped hundreds of dog attack victims recover following an attack. If you have been attacked by a dog, before doing anything else, you should read this: ¿Qué debo hacer después de un ataque de perro? Then, call a dog bite lawyer for a free consultation: 800-298-0111.

Do I Need to Hire a Dog Bite Lawyer After a Dog Attack?

Necesita contratar un abogado de mordedura de perro quien tiene experiencia manejando casos de mordedura de perro. Estos casos pueden ser difíciles para un abogado inexperto porque:

  • the laws are not in one central location so finding the applicable law takes some research, and;
  • determining who is responsible and whether there is coverage can be difficult.

Simmons and Fletcher, P.C., have handed dog attack cases for almost 40 years. Our litigation attorney, Paul Cannon, has been asked to speak and educate other attorneys on how to handle dog bite cases. We have the experience you need to help you with your case. Call us for a free no obligation consultation today.

Finding the Law and Dog Bite Legislation

Pastor alemánDog and pet owner liability law has been a constantly evolving and changing area. The traditional rule of the Common Law known as the “One Free Bite Rule” or “One Bite Rule” for short, was based in premises liability. It is still the primary manner of holding negligent dog owners responsible in the State of Texas as well as 17 other States. Most major cities and many smaller ones as well, however, have enacted more strict ordinances such as “dangerous dog” codes or “leash laws” which place a higher burden of care on the dog owner. There is also a statewide law now, known as “Lillian’s Law” that creates criminal responsibility in certain circumstances when a dog owner allows a known dangerous dog to run at large. 32 States have enacted strict liability statutes for dog bites.

If you have been injured due to an attack by someone else’s animal, you need a dog bite lawyer who knows how to research the correct laws for your area and apply them to your advantage. At Simmons and Fletcher, P.C., we have handled numerous dog bite and animal attack cases and we have the skills to find the laws that may assist your specific case.

La regla de una mordedura libre

Under traditional Common Law, the liability of a landowner for an animal attack arose out of premises liability. If a landowner was aware of a dangerous condition on his property—including an animal—he had a duty to protect and/or warn certain persons of the danger. Out of this arose what became known as the “One Free Bite Rule” or “One Bite Rule for short. Until a dog displayed hostile behavior toward a person, the owner was basically relieved of responsibility if he attacked someone unprovoked. Once the dog had attacked someone, the owner became charged with the knowledge and a duty to protect or warn arose.

This law is still in effect. Because the burden of proving knowledge can be very difficult, this is the hardest way to make a case against an irresponsible pet owner. In order to prove a case, you must generally find evidence of prior attacks or aggressive behavior. Contacting the local animal control department is one resource we use to research prior attacks and bites by a pet. Often people who live in the neighborhood will have knowledge of other times the dog has escaped and attacked people or displayed aggression.

Witness interviews can be critical early on before the events fade or persons with knowledge move away. It is important that you have a Houston dog bite attorney who with the resources and knowledge to the proper investigation.

Ley de perros peligrosos del estado de Texas

The Texas Health and Safety Code sets forth the minimum laws that must be followed in Title 10 Chapter 822. These regulations pertain only to “dangerous dogs.” A “perro peligroso” is defined as a dog that has made an unprovoked attack on a person causing bodily injury in a place other than a qualified enclosure, or; the dog commits unprovoked acts other than from inside a qualified enclosure and those acts cause a person to reasonably believe that the dog will attack and cause bodily injury to that person. Texas Health and Safety Code 822.041(2). Once an owner learns the dog is dangerous, he is required to register the dog with control de animales y refrenar al perro todo el tiempo. De lo contrario, puede generar responsabilidad civil y penal. Código de Salud y Seguridad de Texas 822.044.

La ley de Texas contiene un defecto flagrante. Si el propietario no tiene conocimiento de un ataque previo o de actos de agresividad calificativos que hagan que alguien perciba un ataque como probable, la ley simplemente no se aplica. Por lo tanto, una persona puede guardar cualquier tipo de perro que le guste en su propiedad y reclamar la falta de conocimiento de que el perro fue agresivo o atacó a alguien. Esto es cierto incluso si el perro es un pit bull entrenado como pelea de perros de pelea. Además, dado que la ley solo se aplica a los "perros peligrosos", no se impone un requisito de restricción proactiva a los perros que aún no hayan atacado a nadie. La ley estatal es, en realidad, solo una codificación de la ley estatal común Una regla de mordida libre.

El Código de Salud y Seguridad de Texas permite a los municipios y condados promulgar sus propias leyes de perros más estrictas, sin embargo, prohíbe la promulgación de leyes que sean específicas de la raza. Por lo tanto, una ley que establezca que los dueños de pit bulls o dueños de rottweiler están acusados ​​de saber que su perro es peligroso en virtud de su raza estaría prohibido.

Leyes peligrosas para perros y correas

Haga clic aquí para ver los códigos

Presione aquí Para códigos

Several municipalities and counties have adopted more stringent requirements for pet owners to prevent animals running at large or being left unattended. Dangerous dog laws are ordinances and codes that give the municipality more power to deal with potentially dangerous animals. They typically give animal control departments the power to register, remove and put down dogs that have shown aggression or that are known dangerous breeds. Determining the breed of the dog that attacked you can be very important because it may play a role in what specific requirements the municipality places on the owner in question. Some of these laws place higher duties of care on the owners, including strict liability for damage done by a known dangerous dog or breed.

Leash laws are similar to dangerous dog laws. They are laws created by municipalities to prevent dogs from running at large. Depending on the city, the leash law may be as strict as to impose absolute responsibility on the dog owner if the animal is off a leash anywhere except an enclosed space or as flexible as to only recognize a violation where the owner knowingly allows the dog to run at large. These laws may, in some cases, give an injured person another way to hold an irresponsible pet owner responsible.

Having a skilled Texas dog bite attorney who knows how to find and apply these municipal codes and ordinances that apply to your case can make the difference between winning and losing your case. At Simmons and Fletcher, P.C., our dog bite lawyers will research the laws applicable to your case fight for your rights to the fullest extent under the law.

La ley de Lillian

La ley de Lillian is named after Lillian Stiles, a 76 year old woman who was mauled to death by a pack of pit bull/rottweiler mixes that escaped from a 3 foot high fence in her neighbor-down-the-street’s yard, came onto her property and attacked her while she was mowing the yard. Jose Hernandez, the dogs’ owner, was indicted for criminally negligent homicide. The jury found him not guilty. Lillian’s law was enacted to stiffen the criminal penalties (i.e. more jail time) for persons found criminally negligent
when their animal attacks someone resulting in serious injury or death. This law only applies to dogs running at large and requires a very high burden of proof—the prosecutor must show the owner should have been aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that someone would be seriously injured or killed by his dog.

Lillian’s Law becomes important when the owner is convicted by the State under this law. It is a felony. Evidence of this conviction can go along way not only towards proving negligence, but also towards establishing punitive damages against a grossly negligent or reckless animal owner. Our dog bite attorneys know how to use these convictions to your advantage in your case for civil damages and personal injuries caused by a dog attack.

Negligent Handling

Even if the one bite rule does not apply, there may be liability on the part of the owner under a negligent handling cause of action. Negligent handling is the failure to prevent a dog that is not abnormally dangerous from causing harm when the facts support a duty to do so. based upon the Restatement of Torts 518 that states:

“Except for animal trespass, one who possesses or harbors a domestic animal that he does not know or have reason to know to be abnormally dangerous, is subject to liability for harm done by the animal if, but only if he is negligent in failing to prevent the harm.”

The Restatement of Torts is not law in and of itself, but merely a statement of legal principles that have been accepted by some courts. However, Texas Courts have used this to define a cause of action for the negligent handling of a dog. The elements of a Negligent handling claim are:

  1. Defendant was owner or possessor of the animal.
  2. Defendant owed a duty to exercise reasonable care to prevent the animal from injuring others.
  3. Defendant breached the duty.
  4. Defendant’s breach was a proximate cause of injury.

The key in these cases, is that something must trigger a duty to act that would not other wise be there. For example, if a dog is injured or nursing pups, one should know better than to send a stranger out in the yard with it. Because of these circumstances, a dog owner should be on alert that even a dog that has not shown any vicious propensities abnormal to its class, might become aggressive toward a stranger invading the dog’s space. Another example: A person who has a large dog that he knows jumps up on everyone it meets ought to be on notice not to let the dog run free in a retirement community. Allowing such a dog to do so, even those these are not vicious tendencies could give rise to a negligent handling claim.

Lesiones comunes de ataques de perros

Dog attacks can result in severe and permanent injuries, particularly when the dog involved is powerful and/or has been trained to fight or attack people. Some of the injuries commonly suffered as a result of a dog bite include:

Cualquier ataque puede ser no solo físico sino también emocionalmente cicatrizante.

Tipos de ataques de perros

Manejamos todo tipo de ataques de perros, incluyendo:

Contacte a nuestros abogados de ataque de perros

At Simmons and Fletcher, P.C., we appreciate that we are living in the midst of very difficult economic times. Moreover, we understand that your own financial situation may have become more complex and challenging as the result of being the victim of some sort of animal attack. Therefore, we never charge a fee unless and until we obtain a judgment or settlement on your behalf. Don’t be a victim any longer. Call us today for a free consultation with a abogado de ataque de perro who is skilled enough to determine what laws apply to your case and able to fight for your rights to obtain the maximum recovery you are entitled to under the law. The initial consultation with a dog bit lawyer is free and you pay nothing unless we win your case.

Declaración jurada para iniciar trámites de perros peligrosos

Declaración jurada para iniciar trámites de perros peligrosos

Recursos útiles / Preguntas frecuentes

Números de control de animales

Nuestro abogado, Paul H. Cannon, entrevista sobre Dog Park Dangers

Si desea leer más sobre casos de ataque de perros y la ley de mordedura de perro, visite nuestra sección de mordida de perro de nuestro blog aquí.

Revisión real del cliente

Revisión: 5 / 5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ "Simmons y Fletcher fueron una firma de abogados muy agradable y amigable desde el momento en que entré a mi consulta inicial. Muchas gracias a todos por escucharme y por aceptar mi reclamo. El proceso fue fácil e indolora. Alicia hizo un trabajo magnífico al mantenerme actualizado sobre mi caso. Simmons y Fletcher vienen muy recomendados por mí ". Irma G., cliente real.


G|translate Your license is inactive or expired, please subscribe again!